Abstract :
Background: Psychologically traumatic workplace events (known as critical incidents) occur
within various work environments, with workgroups in certain industries vulnerable to multiple
incidents. With the increasing prevalence of incidents in the USA, incident response is a
growing practice area within occupational medicine, industrial psychology, occupational social
work and other occupational health professions.
Objective: To analyze a measure of incident severity based on level of disruption to the
workplace and explore whether incident severity varied among different industry settings or
between workgroups experiencing multiple vs single traumatic incidents.
Methods: Administrative data mining was employed to examine practice data from a workplace
trauma response unit in the USA. Bivariate analyses were conducted to test whether
scores from an instrument measuring incident severity level varied among industry settings
or between workgroups impacted by multiple vs isolated events.
Results: Incident severity level differed among various industry settings. Banks, retail stores
and fast food restaurants accounted for the most severe incidents, while industrial and manufacturing
sites reported less severe incidents. Workgroups experiencing multiple incidents
reported more severe incidents than workgroups experiencing a single incident.
Conclusion: Occupational health practitioners should be alert to industry differences in several
areas: pre-incident resiliency training, the content of business recovery plans, assessing
worker characteristics, strategies to assist continuous operations and assisting workgroups
impacted by multiple or severe incidents.
Keywords :
industrial , Psychology , Occupational injuries , Workplace violence , Workplace