Author/Authors :
Firouznia, Kavous Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Ghanaati, Hossein Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Sharafi, Aliakbar Medical Physics Department - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Abahashemi, Firouze Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Hashemi, Hassan Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Jalali, Amir Hossein Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Shakiba, Madjid Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR) - Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Background: Uterine artery embolization (UAE) is a minimally invasive procedure performed under fluoroscopy for the treatment of uterine fibroids and accompanied by radiation exposure.
Objectives: To compare ovarian radiation doses during uterine artery embolization (UAE) in patients using conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) with those using digital flat-panel technology.
Patients and Methods: Thirty women who were candidates for UAE were randomly enrolled for one of the two angiographic systems. Ovarian doses were calculated according to in-vitro phantom study results using entrance and exit doses and were compared between the two groups.
Results: The mean right entrance dose was 1586±1221 mGy in the conventional and 522.3±400.1 mGy in the flat panel group (P=0.005). These figures were 1470±1170 mGy and 456±396 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.006). The mean right exit dose was 18.8±12.3 for the conventional and 9.4±6.4 mGy for the flat panel group (P=0.013). These figures were 16.7±11.3 and 10.2±7.2 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.06). The mean right ovarian dose was 139.9±92 in the conventional and 23.6±16.2 mGy in the flat panel group (P<0.0001). These figures were 101.7±77.6 and 24.6±16.9 mGy, respectively for the left side (P=0.002).
Conclusion: Flat panel system can significantly reduce the ovarian radiation dose during UAE compared with conventional DSA.
Keywords :
Uterine Artery , Embolization , Therapeutic , Radiation , Angiography