Title of article :
Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate With Creatinine- Based Versus Cystatin C-Based Equations in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Author/Authors :
Savaj, Shokoufeh Department of Nephrology and Transplant - Hasheminejad Kidney Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Shoushtarizadeh,Tina Department of Nephrology and Transplant - Hasheminejad Kidney Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Abbasi, Mohammad Amin Department of Nephrology and Transplant - Hasheminejad Kidney Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Razavimanesh, Heidar Department of Nephrology and Transplant - Hasheminejad Kidney Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , J Ghods, Ahad Department of Nephrology and Transplant - Hasheminejad Kidney Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction. Serum cystatin C is more sensitive for glomerular
filtration rate (GFR) measurement, but it is not available for clinical
use in all laboratories. Regarding the importance of accurate
estimation of GFR in kidney transplant recipients, we compared
cystatin C-based equations with creatinine-based formulas to
estimate GFR as precisely and simply as possible in kidney
transplant recipients.
Materials and Methods. Seventy living donor kidney transplant
recipients with stable kidney function were enrolled in our study.
The patients’ GFRs were estimated by 3 creatinine-based equations
(the modification of diet in renal disease [MDRD], abbreviated
MDRD, and Cockcroft-Gault) and 5 cystatin C-based equations
(Filler, Le Bricon, Rule, Hoek, and Larsson), and the results were
analyzed.
Results. The mean age of the recipients was 38.7 ± 13.4 years. The
mean GFRs were 67.1 ± 25.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, by the Cockcroft-
Gault; 61.0 ± 17.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, by the abbreviated MDRD;
and 60.0 ±18.6 mL/min/1.73 m2, by the MDRD formulas. Cystatin
C-based GFR estimations were 43.6 ± 16.2 mL/min/1.73 m2,
44.0 ± 13.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, 33.8 ± 14.1 mL/min/1.73 m2,
35.6 ± 13.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 36.9 ± 13.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 by the
Filler, Le Bricon, Larsson, Rule, and Hoek equations, respectively.
The estimates by creatinine-based and cystatin C-based equations
were significantly different and the MDRD estimate was the closest
to the cystatin C-based GFRs.
Conclusions. Our findings revealed the MDRD equation could be
provide a closer estimate of GFR to the cystatin C-based equations
than other creatinine-based GFR calculations in kidney transplant
recipients.
Keywords :
kidney transplantation , glomerular filtration rate , cystatin C
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics