Title of article :
Steroid and Azathioprine Versus Steroid, Cyclosporine, and Azathioprine Therapies in Primary Haplo-Identical Living Donor Kidney Transplantation Twenty-Year Experience
Author/Authors :
Gheith, Osama A Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egyp , Bakr, Mohamed A Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egyp , Fouda, Mohamed A Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egyp , Shokeir, Ahmed A Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egyp , Bayoumy, Ahmed Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egyp , Sobh, Mohamed Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egyp , Ghoneim, Mohamed Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura, Egyp
Abstract :
Introduction. Achievements in short-term graft survival since the
introduction of cyclosporine has not been matched by improvement
in long-term graft function, and chronic allograft nephropathy
remains the second commonest cause of graft attrition over time.
We aimed to evaluate the long-term results of conventional
immunosuppression by steroid and azathioprine in comparison
with cyclosporine-based triple therapy in living donor kidney
transplants.
Materials and Methods. We evaluated the long-term follow-up
data of 369 living related kidney transplant recipients that were on
prednisolone-azathioprine immunosuppressive therapy (group 1)
or triple therapy by prednisolone, cyclosporine, and azathioprine
(group 2). All recipients were followed-up for more than 10 years
(mean, 240 ± 12 months). Comparative analyses included patient and
graft survival rates, condition at last follow-up, graft rejection, and
graft function.
Results. There were 130 patients in group 1 and 239 in group 2.
The overall frequency of acute rejection episodes was not significantly
different between the two groups. However, the proportion of
patients with chronic allograft nephropathy was significantly
higher in group 2 (21% versus 35%, P = .001). Graft survival rates
were 85.3% versus 92.4% at 1 year, 69.9% versus 71.9% at 5 years,
and 52.5% versus 50.8% at 10 years in groups 1 and 2, respectively
(P = .03). The two groups were comparable regarding posttransplant
malignancies, diabetes mellitus, serious bacterial infections, and
hepatic diseases. However, hypertensive patients were significantly
more frequent in group 2.
Conclusions. Chronic allograft nephropathy was significantly
higher in patients receiving cyclosporine, possibly due to the risk
of drug-induced nephrotoxicity, glomerular disease recurrence, and
hypertension. Nowadays, it is possible to achieve excellent calcineurin
inhibitors-free regimen using newer maintenance immunosuppressive
agents.
Keywords :
kidney transplantation , immunosuppression , graft rejections
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics