Title of article :
Fixed Cut-Off for FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6 in Detection of Obstructive and Restrictive Patterns
Author/Authors :
Aghili, Rokhsareh Endocrine Research Center (Firouzgar) - Institute of Endocrinology and Metabolism (Hemmat Campus) - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Kia, Maryam Department of Internal medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Meysamie, Alipasha Department of Community and Preventive Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Aghili, Mojtaba Department of Emergency Medicine - Imam Khomeini Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran , Paknejad, Omalbanin Division of Pulmonology - Shariati Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
Pages :
6
From page :
152
To page :
157
Abstract :
Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD) have been defined by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) as irreversible conditions which are diagnosed by fixed cut-off points of FEV1/FVC. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the cut-off points for FEV1/FEV6 ratio and FEV6 as alternatives for FEV1/FVC and FVC in detection of airway obstruction and lung restriction, respectively. Materials and Methods: A total of 318 Spiro metric examinations of subjects referred to Shariati hospital were analyzed. A subject was considered to have obstruction if FEV1/FVC was lower than 70%. The restriction was defined as FVC < 80% in the absence of obstruction. The Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of FEV1/FEV6 and FEV6 were calculated. Results: This study shows that the current cut-off points used to detect obstruction and restriction can be replaced by FEV1/FEV6 < 71% and FEV6 < 83%, respectively. FEV1/FEV6 had sensitivity of 95.5% and specificity of 99.4%; the PPV and NPVs were 99.3% and 96.3%. The prevalence of obstruction was 49.4%. For restrictive pattern, FEV6 had sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 79.5% with PPV of 18% and NPV of 99.5%. The prevalence of restriction was 6.3%. Conclusions: The FEV1/FEV6 ratio can be used as a valid surrogate for FEV1/FVC in the diagnosis of airway obstruction, especially for screening purposes in high-risk populations for COPD. Moreover, FEV6 is an acceptable alternative for FVC in detection of restrictive pattern.
Keywords :
Pulmonary Disease , Chronic Obstructive , Pulmonary Function Tests
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year :
2013
Record number :
2422234
Link To Document :
بازگشت