Author/Authors :
Asghari, A Faculty of Civil Engineering - Urmia University of Technology , Azimi, B Faculty of Civil Engineering - Urmia University of Technology
Abstract :
Abstract. Recently, there have been many studies about ductility reduction factor of
CBFs, because AISC's seismic design provision has been changed signicantly since 2010.
Therefore, a comprehensive study is needed for seismic designing and ductility reduction
factor of CBFs. In this study, about 160 two-dimensional CBFs with dierent types of
bracing are designed according to AISC-341, and ductility reduction factor of designed
frames is compared to types and formation of bracings in the height of frames. The
results conrm that ductility reduction factor and response modication factor of CBFs
are mostly dependent on types and formation of bracing. Also, maximum allowable height
of OCBFs can be reduced for some types of bracing and be increased for some other
types of bracings. For SCBFs, ductility reduction factor depends on the bracing type and
number of frame stories. For most of SCBFs, ductility reduction factor cannot achieve
more than ten-story frames. So, for these kinds of frames, maximum allowable height
should be decreased, or smaller response modication factor should be used. For double
large-scale CBFs, because of the enormous stiness of one-to-seven-story frames, ductility
reduction factor cannot be obtained and a smaller response modication factor should be
used.
Keywords :
Target displacement , Pushover analysis , Double large-scale concentrically brace , Steel concentrically braced frames , Ductility reduction factor , Response modification factor