Author/Authors :
Ghasemi, Negin Dental and Periodontal Research Center - Department of Endodontics - Dental School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz , Rahimi, Saeed Dental and Periodontal Research Center - Department of Endodontics - Dental School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz , Shahim, Shahriar Dental and Periodontal Research Center - Department of Endodontics - Dental School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz , Samiei, Mohammad Department of Endodontics - Dental School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz , Frough Reyhani, Mohammad Department of Endodontics - Dental School, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz , Ranjkesh, Bahram Department of Dentistry and Oral Health, Aarhus University, Health - Denmark Section for Dental Pathology - Operative Dentistry and Endodontics , Denmark
Abstract :
Introduction: The complexity of the root canal system presents a challenge for the
practitioner. This systematic review evaluated the papers published in the field of root canal
anatomy and configuration of the root canal system in permanent maxillary second molars.
Methods and Materials: All articles related to the root morphology and root canal anatomy
of the permanent maxillary second molars were collected by suitable keywords from PubMed
database. The exhaustive search included all publications from 1981 to December 2015. The
articles relevant to the study were evaluated and data was extracted. The author/year of
publication, country, number of the evaluated teeth, type of study (method of the
evaluation), number of roots and the canals, type of canals and the morphology of the apical
foramen was noted. Results: The highest studied populations were in Brazil and United
States. A total of 116 related papers were found, which had investigated 11945 teeth in total.
Across all the studied populations, the three-rooted anatomy was most common, while the
four-rooted anatomy had the lowest prevalence. The presence of the second mesiobuccal
canal ranged from 11.53 % to 93.7%, where type II (2-1) configuration was the predominant
type in Brazil and USA and types II and III (1-2-1) in Chinese populations. In 8.8-44% of
cases, fusion was observed. The main reported cases were related to palatal root. The major
method of anatomical investigation in case reports was periapical radiography, and the chief
method in morphological studies was CBCT. Conclusion: The clinicians should be aware of
normal morphology and anatomic variations to reduce the treatment failure.
Keywords :
Maxillary Second Molar , Root Canal Anatomy , Root Morphology , Systematic Review