Title of article :
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of the Sealer- Dentine Interface of Three Sealers
Author/Authors :
Mohammadian, Fatemeh Department of Endodontics - Dental School , International Campus of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Farahanimastary, Farzad Dental School, International Campus of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Dibaji, Fatemeh Department of Endodontics - Dental School , International Campus of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Kharazifard, Mohammad Javad Dental Research Center - Dentistry Research Institute - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Abstract :
Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the dentine-sealer interface in three different
sealers using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Methods and Materials: Thirty extracted
human single-rooted teeth were prepared using ProTaper rotary files and were randomly
divided into three groups (n=10) including BC Sealer, AH-Plus and Dorifill. The root canals
were filled with cold lateral condensation technique and stored for 7 days in 100% humidity
at 37°C. Cross sections were prepared from the coronal, middle, and apical sections of the
roots. Then SEM images were taken and the width of gaps was measured by software.
Sectional images were evaluated by two endodontists. Data were analyzed using two- and
one-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: The mean gap width was significantly
lower in coronal area in BC Sealer group compared to Dorifill (P=0.043) and likewise in
AH-Plus group compared to Dorifill (P=0.018). There was no significant difference between
BC Sealer and AH-Plus group in this area (P=0.923). No significant difference was detected
in apical and middle zones among three sealers (P=0.367 and 0.643, respectively). Dentinesealer
interface showed no significant difference in three sealers in the apical area (P=0.051),
but dentine-BC Sealer interface was better than AH-Plus in middle and coronal areas, and
both outperformed Dorifill (P=0.001). Conclusion: BC Sealer and AH-Plus had less gaps
than Dorifill in coronal area. In addition, BC Sealer had better dentine interface in middle
and coronal area compared to AH-Plus, and both performed better than Dorifill. Reverse
relationship was observed between the mean gap width and dentine-sealer interface quality.
Keywords :
Endodontic Sealer , Interface; Gap , Root Sealer , Scanning Electron Microscopy
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics