Enamel Thickness After Preparation of Tooth for Porcelain Laminate

Objective: In this investigation the thickness of enamel in the gingival, middle, and incisal thirds of the labial surface of the anterior teeth were measured regarding prepa- ration of the teeth for porcelain laminate veneers. Materials and Methods: Part one, 20 extracted intact human maxillary central and lateral incisors ten of each were selected. The teeth were imbedded in autopolimerize acrylic resin. Cross section was preformed through the midline of the incisal, middle and cervical one-third of the labial surface of the teeth. The samples were observed under reflected stereomicroscope and the thickness of enamel was recorded. Part II, the effect of different types of preparation on dentin exposure was evaluated. Thirty maxillary central incisor teeth were randomly divided into two groups: A: Knife-edge preparation. B: Chamfer preparation. All samples were embedded in autopolimerize acrylic resin using a silicon mold. The samples were cut through the midline of the teeth. The surface of the samples were polished and enamel and dentin were observed under the stereomicroscope. Results: Data were analyzed by ANOVA-one way test. The results of this study showed that the least enamel thickness in the central incisor was 345 and in lateral in- cisor is 235 μ this thickness is related to the one-third labial cervical area. Maximum Corresponding author: M Mirzaei, Department of Dental Research Center Denti- stry Research Institute, De- partment of Operative Denti- stry, School of Dentistry, Te- hran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran mir1335@yahoo.com Received: 2 February 2014 Accepted: 7 June 2014 thickness in maxillary central and lateral incisors in the one-third labial incisal surface was 1260 μ and 1220μ, respectively. In the second part of the study, the tendency of dentinal exposure was shown with the chamfer preparation, but no dentinal exposure was found in the knife-edge preparation. The differences between groups were signif- icant (p<0.05). Conclusion: The knowledge of enamel thickness in different part of labial surface is very important. The thickness of enamel in the gingival area does not permit a cham- fer preparation. The knife edge preparation is preferable in gingival area.