Title of article :
Comparison of Dentin Permeability After Tooth Cavity Preparation with Diamond Bur and Er:YAG Laser
Author/Authors :
Hasani Tabatabaei, Masoumeh Department of Restorative Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Shirmohammadi, Sara , Yasini, Esmaeil Department of Restorative Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mirzaei, Mansoureh Department of Restorative Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Arami, Sakineh Department of Restorative Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Kermanshah, Hamid Department of Restorative Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Ranjbar Omrani, Ladan Department of Restorative Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Alimi, Azar Department of Restorative Dentistry - Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd , Chiniforush, Nasim Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Nakhostin, Afrooz Department of Restorative Dentistry - Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak , Abbasi, Mahdi Department of Restorative Dentistry - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Pages :
6
From page :
630
To page :
635
Abstract :
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the permeability of dentin after using diamond bur and Er:YAG laser. Materials and Methods: Seventy-two recently extracted, intact, and restoration-free human permanent molars were used in this study. The samples were randomly divided into three groups of 24 each and class I cavities were prepared as follows. Group 1: High speed diamond bur with air and water spray. Group 2: Er:YAG laser. Group 3: Er:YAG laser followed by additional sub-ablative laser treatment. Each group consisted of two subgroups with different cavity depths of 2mm and 4mm. The entire cavity floor was in dentin. Two samples from each subgroup were observed under scanning electron microscope (SEM). The external surfaces of other samples were covered with nail varnish (except the prepared cavity) and immersed in 0.5% methylene blue solution for 48 hours. After irrigation of samples with water, they were sectioned in bucco-lingual direction. Then, the samples were evaluated under a stereomicroscope at ×160 magnification. The data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey’s HSD test. Results: Two-way ANOVA showed significant difference in permeability between groups 2 and 3 (laser groups with and without further treatment) and group 1 (bur group). The highest permeability was seen in the group 1. There was no significant difference in dentin permeability between groups 2 and 3 and no significant difference was observed between different depths (2mm and 4mm). Conclusion: Cavities prepared by laser have less dentin permeability than cavities prepared by diamond bur.
Keywords :
Dental Cavity Preparation , Lasers , Solid-State , Dentin Permeability
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year :
2015
Record number :
2426040
Link To Document :
بازگشت