Author/Authors :
Tafakhori, Abbas Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Neurology Department - Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran , Aghamollaii, Vajiheh Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Neurology Department - Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran , Modabbernia, Amir Hossein Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Neurology Department - Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran , Ghaffarpour, Majid Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Neurology Department - Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran , Ghelichnia Omrani, Hossein Ali Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Neurology Department - Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran , Harirchian, Mohammad Hossein Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Neurology Department - Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran , Mousavi, Mahsa Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Neurology Department - Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran , Faraji, Parastoo Tehran University of Medical Sciences - Neurology Department - Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran
Abstract :
Background: we evaluated the diagnostic value of
Electroencephalography (EEG), video-EEG monitoring (VEM)
and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain with
epilepsy protocol in patients with complex partial epilepsy.
Methods: Forty-two consecutive patients underwent
complete neurological examination, EEG, and MRI with a
modified epilepsy protocol. A subset of these patients
(n=29) also underwent VEM. Data were presented using
descriptive statistics and were analyzed using Chi square
and McNemar tests.
Results: Twenty-four women and eighteen men entered the
study. The mean (±SD) age for patients, was 25.2(±10.1) and
mean (±SD) age at onset was 10.9(±8.1). All patients had
abnormal ictal or interictal EEG. Fifteen patients had normal
MRI. Temporal lobe involvement was the most common
involvement in both EEG (27 patients) and MRI (14 patients).
Interictal EEG was abnormal in 81% of patients which
showed epileptiform discharges in about half of the cases. In
half of patients who had lateralized finding on MRI, site of
the lesion was congruent between MRI and interictal EEG.
Thirty-six patients had symptoms suggesting a specific lobe,
of which interictal EEG was able to show the concordant lobe in 22 (61%) patients. McNemar test showed
superiority of EEG over MRI in correct diagnosis of the
involved lobe based on the clinical manifestations
(P<0.01).
Conclusion: In our setting, both ictal and interictal EEG
perform better than MRI in evaluating complex partial
epilepsy. In addition, combination of these tools may
increase the yield of showing abnormality to near 100%
in patients with complex partial epilepsy.
Keywords :
Partial Epilepsy , Electroencephalography , MRI , Video EEG Monitoring , Iran