Author/Authors :
Mehrafza, Marzieh Mehr Fertility Research Center - Guilan University of Medical Science, Rasht, Iran , Kabodmehri, Roya Reproductive Health Research Center - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology - Alzahra Hospital - Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran , Nikpouri, Zahra Mehr Fertility Research Center - Guilan University of Medical Science, Rasht, Iran , Pourseify, Gholamreza Mehr Fertility Research Center - Guilan University of Medical Science, Rasht, Iran , Raoufi, Azadeh Mehr Fertility Research Center - Guilan University of Medical Science, Rasht, Iran , Eftekhari, Azadeh Mehr Fertility Research Center - Guilan University of Medical Science, Rasht, Iran , Samadnia, Sajedeh Mehr Fertility Research Center - Guilan University of Medical Science, Rasht, Iran , Hosseini, Ahmad Mehr Fertility Research Center - Guilan University of Medical Science, Rasht, Iran
Abstract :
Background: Despite the advancements in assisted reproductive technologies, repeated
implantation failure (RIF) still remains a challenging problem for patients and
clinicians. The aim of the present study was to compare the impact of intrauterine infusion
of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and systemic administration of granulocyte
colony stimulating factor (GCSF) on pregnancy outcome in patients with
repeated implantation failure.
Methods: The present retrospective cohort study included 123 patients with history
of more than two repeated failed embryo transfers. Cycles were divided into two
groups of intrauterine infusion of PRP (n=67) and systemic administration of GCSF
(n=56). Pregnancy outcome was compared between two groups. The p-value less
than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in PRP group than
GCSF group (40.3% versus 21.4%, p=0.025). The crud and adjusted odds ratios
(95% confidence interval (CI)) were 2.5 and 2.6 (p=0.025, CI: 1.11-5.53 and p=0.03,
CI: 1.10-6.15), respectively.
Conclusion: It seems that intrauterine infusion of PRP can positively affect pregnancy
outcome in RIF patients in comparison with systemic administration of GCSF
and more studies need to be designed to conclude the effectiveness of this method.