Title of article :
The Extent of Inappropriate Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Low Back Pain and its Contributory Factors
Author/Authors :
Zargar Balaye Jame, Sanaz Department of Health Management and Economics - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Akbari Sari, Ali Department of Health Management and Economics - Knowledge Utilization Research Centre - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Majdzadeh, Reza Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics - Knowledge Utilization Research Centre - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Rashidian, Arash Department of Health Management and Economics - Knowledge Utilization Research Centre - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Arab, Mohammad Department of Health Management and Economics - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Rahmani, Hojjat Department of Health Care Management - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Pages :
8
From page :
1029
To page :
1036
Abstract :
Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an expensive and commonly used technology with a variety of indications in patient diagnosis and treatments. The aim of this study is to identify a comprehensive list of indications and contraindications for MRI in patients with low back pain (LBP) and to determine the appropriateness of using this technology in these patients on the basis of this list. Methods: A cross‑sectional study was conducted in four radiographic centers in Tehran, Iran. A list of MRI indications and contraindications for LBP was developed by review of documents and expert panel. A pre structured checklist was designed and incorporated into a structured form. All 100 consecutive patients referring to four radiographic centers for performing MRI regarding LBP completed the questionnaire. Chi‑square, Fisher’s Exact Test and logistic Regression were used to assess statistical significance. Results: In this study, 187 patients (46.7%) had an indication for MRI, but 186 patients (46.5%) had no indication, 18 patients (4.5%) had indication and contraindication at the same time and nine patients (2.3%) had contraindication. Moreover, 71 patients (17.8%) underwent MRI for LBP during the past 2 years, of which 14 (19.7%) had normal results. Patients with complementary private insurance had a history of previous MRI about 20% more than other patients (P = 0.018). There was a statistically significant relationship between complementary private insurance coverage and number of MRI performed (P = 0.006). Conclusions: About half of the patients referring to radiographic centers with LBP for MRI had no indication for this test.
Keywords :
Appropriate use , contraindication , low back pain , indication , magnetic resonance imaging
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year :
2014
Record number :
2427671
Link To Document :
بازگشت