Title of article :
The effect of prophylactic peripapillary administration of methylprednisolone in reducing the risk and severity of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A double blind clinical trial
Author/Authors :
Tamizifar, Babak Department of Gastroenterology Diseases - Al-Zahra Hospital - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Shavakhi, Ahmad Department of Gastroenterology Diseases - Al-Zahra Hospital - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Khodadustan, Mahsa Department of Gastroenterology Diseases - Al-Zahra Hospital - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan
Abstract :
Background: The most common complication of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
(ERCP) is acute pancreatitis. A number of therapeutic trials have been studied due to reduce the occurrence of postendoscopic
retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis (PEP) but many of them were unsuccessful. Periampullary corticosteroid
injection was proposed to use as prophylactic agents for PEP because of its anti-inflammatory property with relative low systemic
side effects. Materials and Methods: By conducting a double blinded clinical trial study in a single center university hospital, all
patients undergoing therapeutic or diagnostic ERCP in our gastrointestinal endoscopy ward, enrolled the study. During ERCP, we
randomly assigned the patients in blocks of 40 to undergo a locally injection of methylprednisolone acetate (corticosteroid group) or
saline (control group) on the major papilla and prospectively evaluated the occurrence of PEP pancreatitis in each groups. Clinical
and laboratory findings of acute pancreatitis were collected by means of a validated questionnaire during the procedure and before
discharge. At baseline and end of the study, were compared pancreatitis prevalence and also its severity by using Chi-square and
t-test statistics. Results: The frequency of moderate to severe PEP pain was not significantly between the placebo and corticosteroid
receiving group (13.7% ± 3.2% vs. 9.3% ± 2.1%, respectively; P = 0.8). There is no significant difference in the mean concentration of
lipase and amylase between corticosteroid receiving group and placebo receiving group at the first, second, and third time. In the
corticosteroid receiving group, 3 patients (10.3%) while in the control group, 11 patients (11.3%) developed pancreatitis. Conclusion:
We found no significant difference in PEP rates and also severity between the corticosteroid and placebo groups. The mean increase
in serum amylase and amylase level in pancreatitis patients and the frequency of abdominal pain were not significantly higher in the
placebo group. Besides, there were no cases of severe PEP pancreatitis in either group.
Keywords :
papillary edema , endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography , Corticosteroid pancreatitis
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics