Title of article
Cataract Surgery Outcome in a Referral Center: Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran; Study Protocol
Author/Authors
Hashemi, Hassan Professor of Ophthalmology - Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Jabbarvand, Mahmoud Professor of Ophthalmology - Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Z-Mehrjardi, Hadi Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Majdi, Mercede Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mazouri, Arash Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mohammadi, S-Mehrdad Eye Research Center - Farabi Eye Hospital - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mohammadi, S-Farzad Students’ Scientific Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Alipour, Fatemeh Students’ Scientific Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Pages
9
From page
17
To page
25
Abstract
Purpose: To report a study design for assessing the cataract surgery outcome
Methods: We conducted the study in an eye hospital in which over 13,300 cataract extractions are
performed annually. Sampling framework and recruitment included hospital records of patients who
underwent age-related cataract extraction within the preceding 5 years that were sampled
randomly for 470 patients. Phone recruitment was made and the surgical records were reviewed.
Novel variables were ‘mature cataract rate’, ‘surgeon competence’, ‘surgically challenging eye’,
‘wound enlargement’ and ‘use of an injector to insert an intraocular lens’, ‘posterior capsule status’,
‘postoperative spectacle use’, and ‘unmet need’. Causal diagrams (to facilitate modeling), data
mining (clustering and decision matrix), and outlier analysis were used.
Results: Subjects were categorized as deceased, unavailable, or successfully contacted with the
last subcategorized as participants or non-participants (declined or noncompliant), in a participants’
flow chart. The participation rate was 51%. Participants and non-participants were comparable
regarding baseline and surgical characteristics. The causes of visual impairment were reviewed
and a standardized diagnostic scheme was developed that included eight anatomic headings and
18 disease-specific subheadings. A reporting scheme was sketched.
Conclusion: Despite shortcomings in the quality and availability of the hospital and surgical records
and a relatively low participation rate compared to prospective data collection, this retrospective
cross-sectional approach was practical for evaluating the quality of cataract surgery in a hospital in
a developing country and the protocol is recommended as a guideline to manage such a project.
Keywords
Protocol , Quality of Health Care , Cataract Extraction , Outcome Study
Journal title
Astroparticle Physics
Serial Year
2012
Record number
2430779
Link To Document