Author/Authors :
Chawla, Rohan Department of Ophthalmology - Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences - All India Institute of Medical Sciences - New Delhi, India , Kapoor, Monika Department of Ophthalmology - Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences - All India Institute of Medical Sciences - New Delhi, India , Mehta, Aditi Department of Ophthalmology - Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences - All India Institute of Medical Sciences - New Delhi, India , Tripathy, Koushik Department of Ophthalmology - Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences - All India Institute of Medical Sciences - New Delhi, India , Vohra, Rajpal Department of Ophthalmology - Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences - All India Institute of Medical Sciences - New Delhi, India , Venkatesh, Pradeep Department of Ophthalmology - Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences - All India Institute of Medical Sciences - New Delhi, India
Abstract :
Purpose: To describe our clinical experience with sympathetic ophthalmia (SO) at a tertiary eye care center
in north India.
Methods: In this retrospective case series, analysis of the clinical features and visual outcomes of patients
diagnosed with SO between March 2012 and March 2016 were performed.
Results: Ten male and four female patients (median age, 15.5 years) with SO following penetrating trauma
(10 patients) or ocular surgery (four patients) were included. SO developed 2 weeks to 3 years after the
insult. Mean presenting visual acuity of the sympathizing eyes was 1.086 (LogMAR). Anterior chamber
reaction was documented in all eyes in which it could be assessed (14 sympathizing eyes; five exciting eyes).
Neurosensory detachment was seen in 10 of 14 patients (71.5%). Five patients (35.7%) were managed with
oral steroids alone, whereas nine (64.3%) were treated with intravenous pulse dexamethasone followed
by oral steroids. Inflammation recurred in three patients during steroid tapering, necessitating restarting
of steroid therapy with or without additional immunosuppressants. At the last follow-up, all 14 patients
were in remission with low-dose oral steroids; seven patients were also on immunosuppressants. At the
final follow-up, 12 of 14 (85.7%) sympathizing eyes achieved 20/40 or better visual acuity and three exciting
eyes achieved at least 6/24 visual acuity.
Conclusion: Although SO is a potentially blinding disorder, early detection and individualized treatment
allow most patients achieve good final visual acuity.
Keywords :
Granulomatous Uveitis , Immunosuppressants , Neurosensory Detachment , Panuveitis , Sympathetic Ophthalmia