Title of article :
Real Life Outcomes vs. Clinical Trial Results
Author/Authors :
Zarbin, Marco Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science - Rutgers‑New Jersey Medical School - Rutgers University - Newark - New Jersey, USA
Abstract :
Two questions that clinicians should answer as they attempt to apply the results of clinical trials to clinical
practice are: (1) will statistically significant results be reproduced in their clinical practice; and (2) if nothing
goes wrong in a clinical trial, is everything alright? Regarding the first question, when considering the results
of a randomized, multicenter, prospective, controlled clinical trial, two questions that cannot be addressed
by simply by reading the trial results and that only the practicing clinician can answer are: (1) is the study
population representative of the patient about to be treated; and (2) is the totality of evidence outside the
trial (including the clinician’s own extensive experience) consistent with the trial result? Regarding the
second question, clinicians are advised to recognize that most studies, even Phase 3 trials, are underpowered
to accurately assess the risk of low frequency events.
Keywords :
Clinical Practice , Clinical Trial , Confidence Interval , P value , Rule of Three , Statistical Significance
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics