Title of article :
Evaluation of efficacy of intra-nasal lidocaine for headache relief in patients refer to emergency department
Author/Authors :
Mohammadkarimi, Naser Department of Emergency Medicine - Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd , Jafari, Mohammadali Department of Emergency Medicine - Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd , Mellat, Ali Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd , Kazemi, Ehsan Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd , Shirali, Amir Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd
Abstract :
Background: Headache is a common complaint for emergency visits. Common drugs used in relief of headache are opioids and their
agonists and antagonists, ergot alkaloids, and nonsteroidal anti-infl ammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Lack of appropriate medications or
serious side eff ects of available drugs, motivated us to perform the study for evaluating the effi cacy of intranasal lidocaine on diff erent
types of headache. Materials and Methods: A double-blind, randomized clinical trial (RCT) was performed among 90 adult patients
with acute headache in Shahid Rahnemoon Emergency Center of Yazd city of Iran (45 patients in lidocaine group and 45 patients in
placebo group). Patients with history of epilepsy, allergy to lidocaine, signs of skull base fracture, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 15,
patients younger than 14 years and patients who had received any medication in previous 2 h were excluded. After checking vital
signs and taking the demographic data, one puff of 10% lidocaine or normal saline (placebo) was sprayed into each nostril. Patients’
headache severity measured by visual analog scale (VAS) before drug administration and at 1, 5, 15, and 30 min after intervention.
Data were analyzed by Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 17 and statistical tests including t-test, repeated measures
analysis of variance (ANOVA), Fisher’s exact test, and Mann-Whitney test were performed. Descriptive variables were expressed
by mean ± standard deviation (SD) and quantitative variables reported by frequency and percentages. P-values less than 0.05 were
considered signifi cant. Results: 57.8% of patients were female. Th e mean age of patients was 35.32 years. According to sex and age,
there was no signifi cant diff erence between groups (P-values were 0.83 and 0.21; respectively). Th e mean base pain score was 6.97
in lidocaine group and 6.42 in placebo group which was not signifi cantly diff erent (P-value = 0.198). After intervention, the mean
scores were signifi cantly lower in lidocaine group than placebo group in all mentioned times (P-value < 0.001). Th e primary and
secondary headaches had no signifi cant diff erence in mean pain relief score in lidocaine group (P = 0.602). Conclusion: Intranasal
lidocaine is an effi cient method for pain reduction in patients with headache. Regarding easy administration and little side eff ects,
we recommend this method in patients referred to emergency department (ED) with headache.
Trial Registration Number IRCT: IRCT2013010712050N1
Keywords :
Headache , intranasal , lidocaine
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics