Title of article :
Analgesia for Prostate Biopsy: Efficacy of Diclofenac Patch versus Diclofenac Suppository as Compared to Placebo during Prostate Biopsy
Author/Authors :
Adiyat, Kishore Thekke West Fort Hospital Punkunnam Road Thrissur - Kerala, India , Kanagarajah, Prashanth Madras Medical College E.V.R. Periyar Salai Chennai - Tamilnadu, India , PG, Antony West Fort Hospital Punkunnam Road Thrissur - Kerala, India , Bhat, Suresh West Fort Hospital Punkunnam Road Thrissur - Kerala, India
Abstract :
Background and Aims: Trans-rectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS) remains the gold standard
to diagnose patients with prostate cancer. The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate the efficacy
of diclofenac suppository versus diclofenac patch as compared to placebo, on pain reduction during prostate
biopsy.
Methods: A prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo controlled study was performed in 73 patients
requiring transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUS). Patients were randomly allocated to receive
100 mg diclofenac suppository or 100 mg diclofenac patch or matching placebo 1 hour prior to the procedure.
They were asked to indicate on a 10 cm visual analogue scale the degree of discomfort during probe insertion,
needle penetration and four hours post biopsy. Statistical analysis was done using one way ANOVA. The data
was analyzed using SPSS version 10.0.
Results: Patients given diclofenac suppository and diclofenac patch had statistically significant lower four hour
pain scores than those who were given placebo. There was no statistically significant difference in the pain
scores between the three groups during probe insertion and needle penetration. The three groups were similar
in regards to age, prostate volume, biopsy number, prostate specific antigen levels, histological diagnosis and
complication rate.
Conclusions: Diclofenac in the form of a patch or suppository does not confer a superior intraprocedural
analgesic effect compared to the placebo, but it reduces post procedural pain to a significant extent. We
do not recommend its use as a single agent analgesic for prostate biopsy and it should be used as an
adjunctive analgesic for reducing post procedural pain.
Keywords :
Prostate Biopsy , Prostate Cancer , Trans-Rectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy , Local Analgesia , Local Anesthesia
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics