Author/Authors :
Porcaro, Antonio B Department of Urology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Migliorini, Filippo Department of Urology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Antoniolli, Stefano Zecchini Department of Urology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Cesaro, Giulio Department of Radiology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Pomaro, Elisa Department of Radiology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Ghimenton, Claudio Department of Pathology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Monaco, Carmelo Department of Urology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Rubilotta, Emanuele Department of Urology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Lacola, Vincenzo Department of Urology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Romano, Mario Department of Radiation Oncology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Comunale, Luigi Department of Urology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy , Sava, Teodoro Department of Medical Oncology - Ospedale Civile Maggiore - Azienda Ospedaliera - Verona, Italy
Abstract :
Background and Aims: To assess helical CT sensitivity in detecting preoperatively Multifocal Renal Cell carcinoma
(MFRCC) and clinical occult multifocality in a contemporary and consecutive set of patients according
to a multidisciplinary approach.
Methods: The renal masses were assessed preoperatively by volumetric multislice helical CT with the objective
to detect multifocality. Renal cells carcinoma (RCCs) were classified as unifocal (UF) or multifocal (MF). MFRCCs
were selected in 2 groups including CT detected (CT+) and CT undetected (CT-). RCCs were classified in UF and
MF. MFRCCs were selected in 2 groups including CT+ and CT-. CT and pathologic findings of MFRCCs were
correlated and CT sensitivity was assessed. Statistical methods were performed in order to compare the CT
sensitivity with the overall mean sensitivity calculated from the reported literature, to assess statistical inference
between UF and MF – RCCs; and to detect statistical significance between CT(+) and CT(-) MFRCCs .
Results: Over a period of 24 months, 116 kidney units (KU) of 111 patients were surgically treated for RCC.
Multifocality was assessed in 13/116 KU of 12 patients (10.8%). Helical CT detected preoperative multifocality
in 8/111 patients (7.2%) and preoperative occult multifocality was assessed in 4 (3.6%), as well. Helical
CT sensitivity difference between our (66.7%) and the reported literature experience (22.9%) was significant
(p <0.0001). Significant predictors for multifocality were tumor size (p = 0.007), laterality (p = 0.002), pT (p =
0.008) and surgery (p = 0.0002). Primary tumor size (p = 0.05) and satellite tumor size (p = 0.01) were significantly
correlated to CT-undetected (CT-) multifocal tumors.
Conclusions: In our experience, helical CT was effective in improving preoperative detection of sporadic primary
MRCC as well as in lowering clinical occult multifocality. Clinical predictors of multifocality including bilaterality
and primary tumor size as well as technical and methodological improvements in performing Helical CT
will improve its sensibility in detecting renal masses
less than 0.5 cm. CT preoperative detection of clinical
multifocality may help in planning effective preoperative
surgical treatment as well as lowering local recurrence
after nephron sparing surgery.