• Title of article

    Effect of GBR in Combination with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral on the Healing of Calvarial Defects in Rabbits

  • Author/Authors

    Khoshkhoonejad, AA Department of Periodontics - Faculty of Dentistry - Medical Sciences/ University of Tehran, Tehran , Miremadi, A Department of Periodontics - Faculty of Dentistry - Medical Sciences/ University of Tehran, Tehran , Rokn, AR Department of Periodontics - Faculty of Dentistry - Medical Sciences/ University of Tehran, Tehran , Eslami, B Department of Oral and Maxilofacial Pathology - Faculty of Dentistry - Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran , Dehghan, M Department of Surgery - Faculty of Veterinary - Medical Sciences/ University of Tehran, Tehran , Kalbassi, H

  • Pages
    10
  • From page
    77
  • To page
    86
  • Abstract
    Statement of problem: The guided bone regeneration (GBR) technique does not always produce consistent results. Bone filling within the space provided by the membrane can be incomplete. Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a collagen membrane (Bio- Gide) in combination with or without deproteinezed bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) on the healing of calvarial defects in rabbits. Materials and Methods: Twelve New Zealand white rabbits were used in this randomized single-blind experimental study. Four equal defects were created on the calvarium of all animals. Each defect in each rabbit was randomly assigned to one of the following treatment groups: Group 1(control), no treatment; Group 2, covered with Bio-Gide; Group 3, filled with Bio-Oss; Group 4, filled with Bio-Oss and Bio-Gide. The animals were sacrificed for histologic and histomorphometric analysis, 30 and 60 days after treatment. Results: A significant difference was not observed in regenerated bone between the control and Bio-Gide groups (P>0.05), at 1 and 2 months. The amount of regenerated bone was significantly higher (P<0.05) in the Bio-Oss and Bio-Oss+Bio-Gide groups as compared to the control group. The difference in regenerated bone was not significant (P>0.05) between the Bio-Oss and Bio-Oss+Bio-Gide groups. Bone regeneration increased significantly in all treatment groups, between the two study periods (P<0.05). Conclusion: In groups 3 and 4, the presence of a collagen membrane did not affect the amount of new bone regeneration. According to these results, use of a collagen membrane has no additional benefit in the regeneration of intrabony defects.
  • Keywords
    Animal study , Bone graft , Deproteinized bovine bone mineral , Collagen membrane , Bio-Gide , Histomorphometry
  • Journal title
    Astroparticle Physics
  • Serial Year
    2006
  • Record number

    2435444