Title of article :
Construction of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire for Assessing Plagiarism
Author/Authors :
Poorolajal, J Research Center for Health Sciences and Dept. of Epidemiology & Biostatistics - School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan , Cheraghi, P Dept. of Public Health - School of Public Health - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , Doosti Irani, A Dept. of Epidemiology & Biostatistics - School of Public Health - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan , Cheraghi, Z Dept. of Epidemiology & Biostatistics - School of Public Health - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan , Mirfakhraei, M Dept. of Epidemiology & Biostatistics - School of Public Health - Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan
Abstract :
Background: This study was conducted to develop a questionnaire in order to evaluate knowledge, attitude and practice
(KAP) of the faculty members and students toward plagiarism.
Methods: A KAP study was conducted from June to October 2011 enrolling 390 volunteers anonymously (response
rate 96%). The questionnaire included the following four parts: (a) general characteristics like gender, academic degree
and education level; (b) nine questions regarding knowledge (Min=0, Max=9); (c) nine questions regarding attitude
(Min=9, Max=27); and (d) eight questions regarding practice (Min=0, Max=8). A pilot study was conducted to assess
reliability of the questions regarding knowledge and attitude. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the knowledge and attitude
questions was 0.70 and 0.74 respectively.
Results: The overall prevalence of at least once plagiarism commission was 38% (SD=0.035). The overall mean score
of knowledge, attitude and practice was 5.94 (SD=1.66), 24.12 (SD=2.99), and 0.66 (SD=1.15) respectively.
Knowledge of plagiarism was significantly higher among higher academic degrees and females. Their negative attitude
toward plagiarism was stronger too. No statistically significant difference regarding plagiarism commission was observed
among different academic degrees in both sexes. According to linear regression analysis, plagiarism commission
decreased 13% per one unit increase in score of knowledge (P=0.005) and 16% per one unit increase in score of attitude
(P<0.001).
Conclusions: This knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) questionnaire was developed as a standard tool in order
to assess perception of subjects toward plagiarism and to estimate the prevalence and the type of plagiarism commission.
Keywords :
Plagiarism , Questionnaire , Knowledge , Attitude , Practice , Iran
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics