Abstract :
Sassanian artists were realistic in creating memorial artworks, but their artistic style did not necessarily result in exact
depiction of figures with accurate facial representations. In contrast, such realism manifests itself only through determined appearances
and unchangeable artistic conventions. Doing so, identifying people is only possible by recognizing their distinct crowns, headbands,
attire, specific signs, position in queues, their posture and overall representation in the figure. Based on semiological analyses, in this
paper, it has been argued that Pāpak, a member of the famous clan of Qāren was “Bidaxš” and that vice-regent of Bahram II, Bahram
III, Nerseh and Hormizd II. Contrary to some scholars’ argument concerning the resemblance between the symbols of Bidaxš and those
of the Qāren clan, a close comparison shows a significant dissimilarity between the two. While the symbol of the clan of Qāren is a
blossoming bud on a horizontal line, the symbol of Bidaxš is a bud surrounded by two leaves. That is not portrayed on a horizontal
line. The relief of Hormizd II at Naqsh-e Rustam is perhaps the best example in this case, which clearly demonstrates the difference
between the two symbols. At Naqsh-e Rustam, both symbols are depicted on the helmet of Hormizd II’s defeated enemy. The nobility
of “Bidaxš Pāpak,” therefore, refutes the stereotype idea among some scholars who argue that the rank of Bidaxš was only restricted
to the royal family.
Keywords :
Sassanid dynasty , Bidaxš , Pāpak , The clan of Qāren , Semiology