Title of article :
Comparison of Lead and Cerrobend Blocks for Incident Photon Flux of 6 and 15 MV X‐rays
Author/Authors :
Iftikhar, A Center for Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy (CENAR) - BMC Complex - Quetta, Pakistan , Wazir, M Institute of Nuclear Medicine - Oncology and Radiotherapy - Abbotabad, Pakistan , Kakakhail, MB Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) Islamabad, Pakistan , Sbilal, A Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS) Islamabad, Pakistan , Amjad, H Institute of Nuclear Medicine - Oncology and Radiotherapy - Abbotabad, Pakistan , Khwaja, A Center for Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy (CENAR) - BMC Complex - Quetta, Pakistan , Khushnaseeb, A Center for Nuclear Medicine and Radiotherapy (CENAR) - BMC Complex - Quetta, Pakistan
Abstract :
Background: During radiotherapy treatment, critical organs are shielded using
lead and cerrobend blocks. The objective of this study is to compare the effects of
lead and cerrobend shielding blocks on incident photon beam.
Methods: Collimator scatter factors were measured for open square fields
(3 x 3 cm to 40 x 40 cm) defined by collimator jaws and for fields blocked down
to smaller asymmetric fields by using five different Lead and Cerrobend blocks for
6 and 15 MV photon beams from a Varian Clinac 2100C accelerator. The
measurements in air were performed using Farmer type ionization chamber fitted
with acrylic build up caps.
Results: The Block Tray Factor (BTF) increased with field size for both 6 and 15
MV photon beams. In case of Lead blocks, the extreme variations in BTF for 6 MV
photon beam are 0.70 %, 0.84 %, 0.56%, 0.80 % and 1.15 %. Similarly, for 15
MV the maximum variations for Lead blocks are 0.46 %, 0.60 %, 0.83 %, 0.88 %
and 1.10 % respectively. No significant difference has been observed in the BTF
of Cerrobend blocks for 6 and 15 MV photon beams.
Discussion: The dose received by a point in air apparently shielded by lead
blocks has three main contributions: 1. Due to primary photon beam transmitted
through the block, 2. Due to scattered photons, 3. Due to contamination electrons.
These three factors collectively cause the increase in BTF with increasing field size,
energy, and decreasing block size. Conclusions: The effect of shielding on the beam output increases with field size,
beam energy and shield size. This increase follows almost the same pattern for
both lead and cerrobend shielding blocks. Therefore shield factors for all field
sizes, beam energies and shield sizes should be determined separately for precise
patient dose delivery.
Keywords :
Cerrobend shielding blocks , Output factor , Build up caps
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics