Title of article :
Comparison of ocular biometry measurements by applanation and immersion A-scan techniques
Author/Authors :
Ademola-Popoola, Dupe S. Department of Radiology - University of Ilorin, Nigeria , Nzeh, Donald A. Department of Radiology - University of Ilorin, Nigeria , Saka, Sadiat E. Department of Ophthalmology - University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria , Olokoba, Lateefat B. Department of Ophthalmology - University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria , Obajolowo, Tokunbo S. Department of Ophthalmology - University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria
Abstract :
Purpose: The study compared ocular biometry values using applanation and immersion techniques to determine the most applicable method for
our tertiary training centre where personnel with different levels of experience and expertise in biometry take measurements used in calculation
of required intraocular lens before cataract surgery.
Methods: The study was a prospective cross-sectional comparative study of different techniques of ocular biometry from diagnostic equipment
(biometry probe 10 MHz Sonomed® A-scan (PACSCAN 300A, USA). Measurement variables were obtained among children and adults undergoing
cataract surgery. Scleral (Prager) shell was used for the immersion technique followed by the contact technique by the same examiner.
Results: The biometry values of 92 eyes of 92 adult were taken. Their ages ranged from 18 to 95 years with a mean of 64.7 (SD ± 12.9) years.
There were 55 (59.8%) males and 37 (40.2%) females, with a male to female ratio of 1.5:1.
Average axial length (22.0e24.4 mm) eyes were the most common eyes measured in 75 (81.5%) of the cases. The means of the axial lengths
biometry values with immersion and contact technique were 23.66(±1.36) and 23.46 mm (±1.46); the axial length differences was
0.2 ± 0.26 mm (range 0.0e0.94 mm) and statistically significant (95% CI of the Difference 0.15 to 0.26, p ¼ 0.000). The Standard deviation SD
(mm) of Individual Eye Axial Length showed a mean of 0.03 ± 0.04 (0.0e0.3) mm for immersion and for contact technique
0.14 ± 0.12(0.0e0.6)mm.
Conclusion: There was a significant difference in ocular biometry measurement with the contact and immersion ultrasound techniques. The
immersion technique had better repeatability, thus it is ideal in a training hospital setting in a typical in sub-Saharan Africa who have limited
resources to employ a dedicated person to do biometry; and where the different operators of A-scan machines have different levels of experience
and expertise.
Keywords :
Ocular biometry , Applanation , Immersion , Techniques , Adults , Training
Journal title :
Journal of Current Ophthalmology
Journal title :
Journal of Current Ophthalmology