Title of article :
STUDY OF ADVANTAGES and DISADVANTAGES OF TOTALLY IMPLANTABLE VENOUS ACCESS DEVICE
Author/Authors :
Ahmadi, J Department of Pediatric Surgery - School of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Izadyar, M Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology - School of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Ashjaei, B Department of Pediatric Surgery - School of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Klantari, M Department of Pediatric Surgery - School of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Nahvi, H Department of Pediatric Surgery - School of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Joodi, M Department of Pediatric Surgery - School of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Vali, M Department of Pediatric Surgery - School of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Mehrabi, V Department of Pediatric Surgery - School of Medicine - Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVAD) or implantable catheter ports are
devices which can be implanted subcutaneously. They enable prolonged and repeated access to the
vascular system, into the peritoneal cavity or intravertebral space. This device is particularly useful for
repeated medical injection, for blood sampling or transfusion of blood and blood derivatives and for
total parenteral nutrition (TPN). Although many patients benefit from the insertion of TIVAD without
any secondary effects, any surgical implantation can nevertheless lead to complications. In this study,
we investigated the advantages and disadvantages of TIVAD catheter in pediatric age group. A total of
94 cases, 2 to 14 years old, were included in our study. We implanted TIVAD in these patients for
chemotherapy in 83 cases (88.29%), for prolonged TPN in 6 cases (6.38%), for corticosteroid and
antibiotic therapy after Kasai operation in 2 cases (2.12%), for intermittent IV therapy in 2 cases
(2.12%) and for need to partial parenteral nutrition in 1 case (1.06%). Out of 94 cases, 14 cases (15%)
had some kind of complications and 80 cases (85%) had no complication. There was no mortality. Most
patients and their parents (82 cases, 87.23%) were satisfied from TIVAD. It seems that TIVAD can be a
useful device for many chronic patients who need an IV access for multiple injections.
Keywords :
Implantable venous access device , parenteral nutrition
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics