Author/Authors :
Goto, Koji Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Oita University - Idaigaoka- Hasamamachi, Yufu City, Oita, Japan , Yasuda, Norihisa Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Oita University - Idaigaoka- Hasamamachi, Yufu City, Oita, Japan , Hidaka, Seigo Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Oita University - Idaigaoka- Hasamamachi, Yufu City, Oita, Japan , Kitano, Takaaki Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine - Faculty of Medicine - Oita University - Idaigaoka- Hasamamachi, Yufu City, Oita, Japan , Hatanaka, Yoshihiro Medical Material Laboratory - Asahi Kasei Medical Company, Oaza-Sato, Oita, Japan , Inoue, Satoru Medical Material Laboratory - Asahi Kasei Medical Company, Oaza-Sato, Oita, Japan
Abstract :
Background: Acute blood purification (ABP) therapy is used
regularly in the clinical setting and reportedly alleviates organ
failure associated with severe systemic inflammatory responses,
leading to reduced mortality. The present study aimed to
determine whether there is a difference in efficacy between
polysulfone (PS) membranes, which are currently used regularly
in the clinical setting, and vitamin E-coated polysulfone (VEPS)
membranes, which are anticipated to exhibit the antioxidant and
anti-inflammatory properties of vitamin E.
Methods: Male Wistar rats (n=15/group) were intravenously
administered 10 mg/kg of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) to establish
a systemic inflammatory response model. Six hours after
LPS administration, hemodiafiltration (HDF) was performed
for 30 minutes using a PS or VEPS membrane under general
anesthesia. Blood was collected at various time points, lung
tissue was evaluated histologically, and 24-hour survival was
assessed.
Results: The rats in the VEPS group tended to have a higher
survival rate than those in the PS group when undergoing HDF,
although the difference was not significant. With respect to lung
tissue, the inflammatory response was suppressed to a greater
extent in the VEPS group than the PS group. Serum interleukin
(IL)-6 levels were reduced at an early stage, plasma antioxidant
activity was increased, and oxidative stress was reduced in the
VEPS group compared to the PS group.
Conclusion: Relative to PS membrane-based HDF, the survival
rate tended to improve and inflammation was subdued earlier due
to the antioxidant activity and early attenuation of inflammation
associated with VEPS membrane-based HDF.
Keywords :
Vitamin E , Inflammatory response , Polysulfone , Hemodiafiltration , Rats