Title of article :
Evaluation of Different Risk Factors for Early Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus
Author/Authors :
Habibi Moeini, S Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mirmiran, P Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mehrabi, Y Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Azizi, F Endocrine and Metabolism Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Abstract :
Background: The efficacy of various screening variables in
detection of diabetes mellitus (DM) is unclear.
Objective: To determine the efficacy of various diagnostic
tests for type 2 DM.
Methods: 1021 inhabitants of Hakimieh district of Tehran
aged between 30 and 75 years were studied. Known cases of
diabetes and those with factors influencing glucose tolerance
test were excluded. Age, sex, family history of DM, history of
gestational diabetes, body mass index (BMI), waist hip ratio,
blood pressure, urine glucose 2 hours after breakfast, fasting
plasma glucose (FPG) and serum glucose 2 hours after
consumption of 75 gm glucose (2hPG) were determined.
Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of each of these
variables in comparison to WHO criteria were assessed.
Results: According to WHO criteria, 5.9% of the population
had undiagnosed diabetes. This rate declined to 3.8 % when
employing the latest American Diabetes Association (ADA)
diagnostic criteria (FPG³126 mg/dl). 88% of these newly
diagnosed diabetics were diagnosed by means of 2hPG of
whom 15% were classified within the normal group by ADA
criteria. The 2hPG test showed higher reproducibility than the
FPG test (84% vs. 67%). Truncal obesity had the maximum
sensitivity (67%) and glycosuria had the highest specificity
(99%). Therefore, none of these indices could be considered as
a reliable screening method. Regarding 87% sensitivity and
54% specificity, a single method can be used as a proper
screening test for men under 50 years of age. In women of
similar age, two positive risk factors might be recruited as a
useful screening method. However, the sensitivity and
specificity approximated 82% and 59%, respectively.
Conclusion: 2hPG is the most reliable test for diagnosis of
DM. Screening via risk factors is not useful in people older
than 50 years. Individuals aged <50 years, men with at least
one positive risk factor and women with a minimum of two
positive risk factors, are appropriate candidates for final
diagnosis by glucose tolerance test.
Keywords :
Diabetes Mellitus , Diagnosis , Screening
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics