Author/Authors :
Tadayon, Behrooz Civil Engineering Department - Faculty of Engineering - Hormozgan University , Dehghani, Hamid Civil Engineering Department - Faculty of Engineering - Hormozgan University , Ershadi, Cyrus Civil Engineering Department - Faculty of Engineering - Hormozgan University
Abstract :
One of the most important issues in the area of coastal structures design is
determination of forces and loadings resulted from shallow water wave
breaking. In the process of wave breaking, the subsequent particle motion is
transformed from irrotational to rotational motion and due to this matter,
vorticity and turbulence are generated and the sediment transport is affected by
this phenomenon. Therefore, it is necessary to know about the location of wave
breaking and other parameters such as the breaker height, breaker depth, etc.
Over the last century, several formulas have been presented for predicting the
wave breaking onset. These formulas depend on many parameters (e.g. seabed
slope, water depth at the location of breaking, offshore wave height, etc.) that
need to be known in order to obtain the desired wave breaking parameter (e.g.
breaker height). In this study, some of the formulas for predicting wave
breaking onset proposed in the recent decade are evaluated using the available
laboratory data and it is tried to find out which formula is more suitable in
different cases and conditions. A refinement process is carried out for choosing
the appropriate data points out of all the available compiled laboratory data. The
comparison is carried out in two phases. In the first one, the formulas are
compared using all the data and in the second one, the comparisons are made
based on the breaker type. These two phases yield to different outcomes. In the
first phase, the formula proposed by Delavari et al. has the lowest values of bias,
relative error, scatter index and root mean square error and the coefficient of
determination of Goda’s formula is the highest. In the second phase, the data
are categorized based on the plunging and spilling breaker types and the
comparisons are made based on this categorization. The outcomes derived from
the first phase are different from the ones derived from the second one.
Keywords :
wave breaking , breaker type , breaker height , breaker depth , laboratory data