Author/Authors :
Kaivanpanah, Shiva University of Tehran , Nemati, Majid University of Tehran , Sharifi, Asadollah University of Tehran
Abstract :
This study is an attempt to investigate the Iranian TOEFL/IELTS
teachers’ written feedback practices and their perception of written
feedback in writing classes. The examination of the questionnaires given
to 30 TOEFL/IELTS writing teachers and the analysis of their written
feedbacks on 300 students’ essays indicate that although the majority of
the teachers believe that they should provide feedback on the language
(i.e., spelling, grammar, vocabulary, capitalization, and punctuation),
organization (i.e., cohesion, coherence, and unity), and content of
students’ essays, most of their written feedbacks are concerned with the
language of their students’ essays. In fact, a discrepancy was found
between the teachers’ perception and their practice in the provision of
feedback. In addition, although the majority of the teachers believed that
they should give indirect feedback on their students’ writings, most of
their written feedbacks were direct. This lack of harmony between the
teachers’ perception and their practice in providing written feedback calls
for more attention.
Keywords :
feedback on global errors , feedback on local errors , indirect feedback , direct feedback , teacher feedback