Author/Authors :
Samandari, Mohammad Hasan Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - School of Dentistry - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Haghighat, Abbas Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - School of Dentistry - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Torabinia, Nakisa Department of Oral Pathology - School of Dentistry - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences , Taghian, Mehdi Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - School of Dentistry - Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari , Sadri, Leyli Department of Pediatric Dentistry - Students Research Center - Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan , Naemy, Vahid Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery - Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan
Abstract :
Background: Plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and freeze‑dried bone allograft (FDBA) are
shown to promote bone healing. This study was aimed to histologically and histomorphometrically
investigate the effect of combined use of PRGF and FDBA on bone formation, and compare it to
FDBA alone and control group.
Materials and Methods: The distal roots of the lower premolars were extracted bilaterally in four
female dogs. Sockets were randomly divided into FDBA + PRGF, FDBA, and control groups. Two dogs
were sacrificed after 2 weeks and two dogs were sacrificed after 4 weeks. Sockets were assessed
histologically and histomorphometrically. Data were analyzed by Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Mann–
Whitney U‑tests utilizing the SPSS software version 20. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: While the difference in density of fibrous tissue in three groups was not statistically
significant (P = 0.343), the bone density in grafted groups was significantly higher than the control
group (P = 0.021). The least decrease in all socket dimensions was observed in the FDBA group.
However, these differences were only significant in coronal portion at week 4. Regarding socket
dimensions and bone density, the difference between FDBA and FDBA+PRGF groups was not
significant in middle and apical portions.
Conclusion: The superiority of PRGF+FDBA overFDBA in socket preservation cannot be
concluded from this experiment.