Author/Authors :
Babaee, Neda Dental Materials Research Center - Department of Oral Medicine - Faculty of Dentistry - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Kazemi, Hamed Department of Oral Medicine - Faculty of Dentistry - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Sefidgar, Ali Asghar Department of Mycology and Parasitology - Faculty of Medicine -Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Bijani, Ali Non-Communicable Pediatric Diseases Research Center - Health Research Institute - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Pouramir, Mehdi Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics - Faculty of Medicine - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Mortazavi, Hadi Department of Oral Medicine - Faculty of Dentistry - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran , Ghasemi, Nafiseh General Dentist, Esfahan, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: Alpha amylase is the most abundant enzyme of parotid gland. This enzyme starts
digestion of carbohydrates in the mouth. A pair of parotid glands is located in front of ears. Several
studies have been conducted on the effects of mobile phones on the parotid gland. The aim of this
study was to investigate the effects of mobile phones on the activity of the amylase enzyme.
Materials &Methods: Totally, 251 men and women aged 18 to 55 years, who only used Hamrahe
Aval's operator were included. Parotid salivary samples of each individual were bilaterally
collected using capillary tube placed in the vicinity of Stensen's duct. Bilateral amylase activity of
each individual was evaluated with spectrophotometric method in the laboratory considering
dominant sides of phone conversation and chewing. Data were analyzed using Two-way ANOVA,
χ2, T test and SPSS software.
Results: The relationship between the dominant phone conversation side and parotid amylase
activity was not statistically significant but the correlation between prevailing chewing side and
amylase activity was statistically significant (p=0.001).
Conclusion: Handheld mobile phone was not effective on parotid amylase enzyme activity
whereas chewing was effective on parotid amylase enzyme activity.
Keywords :
Chewing , Mobile phone , Parotid gland , Amylase