Author/Authors :
Khakbaz Baboli, Soheil Student Research Committee - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran , Amirian Chaijan, Kamran Dental Materials Research Center - Health Research Institute - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran , Rezaei Dastjerdi, Maryam Oral Health Research Center - Health Research Institute - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran , Gholinia, Hemmat Health Research Institute - Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, IR Iran
Abstract :
ntroduction: Soft liners are materials used in removable dental prostheses to maintain the health
of inflamed mucous membranes. The materials bond strength to acrylic bases can be modified by
several methods; One of which includes sandblasting. The aim of this study is to investigate the
effect of sandblasting on the tensile bond strength(TBS) of two permanent silicone soft liners.
Material & Methods: 36 dumbbell-shaped heat-cured polymethylmethacrylate acrylic specimens
were fabricated in denture flasks with a length of 75 mm, width of 12 mm and a thickness of 7 mm
in the thinnest section. 3 mm of the material of all specimens was cut using a low-speed diamond
saw with water cooling. Then according to the surface treatment and sofliners, the specimens were
divided into four groups: no surface treatment with mollosil softliner, no surface treatment with
GC softliner, sandblasting with 50 μm Al2O3 particles and then using mollosil soft liner and
sandblasting with 50 μm Al2O3 particles and then using GC soft liner. After polymerization of all
specimens, TBS was evaluated with universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 5 mm/min
until failure. Finally, two-way ANOVA and independent T-test were used to analyzing the data.
Results: The mean of TBS in the groups of sandblasting was significantly higher than other group
and the mean of TBS in the group of mollosil was higher than GC group with or without
sandblasting. (p=0.001)
Conclusion: Sandblasting increases the TBS of silicone soft liners to the acrylic bases; moreover,
Mollosil softliners are more tenacious compared to GC.