Author/Authors :
Zare Jahromi, Maryam Department of Endodontic - Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran , Barekatain, Mehrdad Department of Operative Dentistry - Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran , Bonakdar Hashemi, Niloufar Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Isfahan, Iran , Refaei, Poorandokht Department of Endodontics - Islamic Azad University Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch,Isfahan, Iran
Abstract :
Introduction: Cervical root resorption is one of the most important complications of intra coronal
bleaching .A way of preventing this type of resorption is using a coronal barrier under the
bleaching materials. The aim of this study was to compare the sealing ability of glass ionomer
cement and Pro Root Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) as a coronal barrier in intra coronal
bleaching.
Materials &Methods: In this study, 40 single-root maxillary anterior teeth were endodontically
prepared and divided into two experimental groups (n= 15) and two positive and negative control
groups (n=5). In the experimental groups, gutta percha was removed up to 3 mm below the
cemento enamel junction (CEJ).RMGI and MTA were placed over gutta percha up to the level of
CEJ. After a 24-hour incubation period, the bleaching agent (a mixture of sodium perborate and
30% hydrogen peroxide) was placed in the access cavities. The bleaching agents were replaced
every 3 days over 9 days. Then, the access cavity was filled with 2% methylene blue for 48 hours.
All samples were longitudinally sectioned and the dye penetration range was evaluated using a
stereomicroscope. Data were statistically analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests
(α=0.05).
Results: Leakage mean indicated that there was a significant difference between these two groups
and leakage was less in ProRoot than glass ionomer.
Conclusion: It seems that the MTA can provide a better coronal seal during the bleaching.