Title of article :
Comparison of Muscle Recruitment Patterns During Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit in “Movement System Impairment” Subgroups of Low Back Pain and Healthy Women
Author/Authors :
Orakifar, Neda Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences , Shaterzadeh-Yazdi, Mohammad Jafar Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences , Salehi, Reza Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences , Mehravar, Mohammad Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences , Namnik, Neda Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center - Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Background: While various studies have examined motor control differences
between subjects with and without low back pain (LBP), only a few have investigated
the muscle recruitment pattern in classified LBP patients during functional activity.
The aim of this study was to investigate the firing pattern of the main muscles
involved in sit-to-stand (STD) and stand-to-sit (STS) tasks in two prevalent LBP
subgroups based on movement system impairment (MSI) classification.
Methods: A total of 37 women between 18 and 50 years of age voluntarily
participated in this cross-sectional study. They were divided into three groups (15
healthy, 15 lumbar extension rotation syndrome (LERS), and seven lumbar flexion
rotation syndrome (LFRS)). Surface electromyography was recorded bilaterally
from the trunk stabilizer muscles—i.e. the internal oblique (IO), lumbar erector
spine (ES), and hip mobilizer muscles—and the medial (MH) and lateral (LH)
hamstring muscles during STD and STS tasks. The variations in EMG onset
muscle timing and asymmetry in side-to-side muscle timing were measured.
Results: The firing sequence during the STD task showed no significant
difference among groups. However, in the healthy and LFR groups the trunk
stabilizer muscles were activated before the hip mobilizer muscles, and in the
LERS group an insignificant delay was shown in the onset of the ES activity.
There was no significant difference of bilateral muscle timing during STD. In
the STS task no consistent order of pattern was found even in the healthy group.
The bilateral muscle timing of IO (mean difference, -427.00; P=0.021) and ES
(mean difference, 1964.57; P=0.000) had significant difference in the LFRS
group during STS.
Conclusion: The cumulative effects of recruitment pattern impairment may
contribute to continuing the cycle of lumbar movement impairments and
subsequent persistence of LBP
Keywords :
Low back pain , Classification , Surface electromyography , Recruitment pattern
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics