• Title of article

    Designing a Tool to Assess Medical Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes of Confidentiality and Disclosure of Patient Information

  • Author/Authors

    Hosseini-Qavam-Abad ، Leila Faculty of Medicine, Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS) - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Asghari ، Fariba Medical Ethics and History of Medicine Research Center - Tehran University of Medical Sciences , Bandehagh ، Ali Department of Biotechnology - Faculty of Agriculture - University of Tabriz , Bigdeli ، Shoaleh Faculty of Medicine, Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences (CERMS) - Iran University of Medical Sciences , Najafpour ، Sadigheh Educational Development Center - Jahrom University of Medical Sciences

  • Pages
    6
  • From page
    75
  • To page
    80
  • Abstract
    Background and purpose: Respecting confidentiality of documents and medical information about individuals, as one of the most important issues in medicine, guarantees patients trust in the health system. Therefore, this study is an attempt to design a valid and reliable tool to assess knowledge and attitudes of medical students about the principles of confidentiality and disclosure of patient information. Methods: To design the questionnaire, a comprehensive review of literature was conducted. Since to the best of our knowledge, there was no valid and reliable tool, a 34-questions questionnaire consisting of two sections of knowledge and attitude was designed. Then, face and content validity of the questionnaire was investigated by expert opinion. Finally, content validity index (CVI), content validity ratio (CVR) and item usability index (IUI) were calculated, and the reliability of the instrument was measured by Cronbach’s Alpha. Then, the final questionnaire was assessed by faculty members of ethics and medical education (n=10) for simplicity, relevance, and clarity of the questions. Lastly, the questionnaire was distributed among medical interns (n=40) and its reliability was examined. Afterwards, the questionnaire was distributed among 160 medical interns, and the reliability and validity of its structure was evaluated. Results: The designed questionnaire CVI and CVR were 0.80 and 0.81 for knowledge and 0.78 and 0.83 for attitude sections. All the questions were confirmed as valid and reliable. The validity of the questionnaire for knowledge and attitude sections were 0.79 and 0.82, respectively. Conclusions: Validity and reliability of all the designed questions (17 in each section) were confirmed.
  • Keywords
    confidentiality , disclosure of patients’ information , validity , reliability , questionnaire
  • Journal title
    Journal of Medical Education
  • Serial Year
    2016
  • Journal title
    Journal of Medical Education
  • Record number

    2483297