Title of article :
Development and validation of the perioperative recovery scale for integrative medicine
Author/Authors :
Zhou ، Li The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine , Su ، Bi-Ying Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine , Liu ، Shao-Nan The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine , Li ، Xiao-Yan The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine , Cao ، Li-Xing The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine , Lu ، Li-Ming Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine , Wen ، Ze-Huai The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine , Chen ، Zhi-Qiang The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine
Pages :
11
From page :
184
To page :
194
Abstract :
Purpose: The aim of this study is to develop and validate a scale for perioperative recovery with integrative medicine. Methods: The procedures for developing the scale included a review of both modern and ancient literature, other perioperative scales or questionnaire references, an expert consultation, and interviews with patients and surgeons following standard procedures. Primary face and content validity were assessed through a smallscale patient survey of 50 patients. A final evaluation based on the patient survey was conducted among 354 patients (age range 1675) from the same hospital. This included testing the perioperative recovery scale for integrative medicine (PRSIM) for scaling properties, reliability, validity and responsiveness. Results: The PRSIM, a 20item scale, was modified from an initial version transcript which included 122 items. The 20 items in the PRSIM covered five domains:direct influence, indirect influence, activity, mental function and general health perceptions. Five factors extracted from an exploratory factor analysis demonstrated a desirable model fit. A confirmatory factor analysis further indicated that the PRSIM had a good fit with the same sample. A data analysis of the PRSIM with 349 patients showed that it had good internal consistency (α gt; 0.7), testretest reliability (ICC gt; 0.4) and split half reliability (α=0.66). Conclusions: The PRSIM can serve as a valuable instrument for assessing patient perioperative recovery in integrative medicine. It is acceptable for patients in the perioperative period undergoing treatment by either Chinese or integrative medicine, and has good psychometric properties. Registration number:ChiCTRTRC09000527.
Keywords :
PRSIM instrument , Psychometric test , Reliability , Validity , Responsiveness , Chinese medicine , Integrative medicine
Journal title :
Traditional Medicine Research
Serial Year :
2019
Journal title :
Traditional Medicine Research
Record number :
2483456
Link To Document :
بازگشت