Title of article :
Comparing Plasmapheresis plus IVIg with Plasmapheresis plus IVIg plus Rituximab on the Management of Suspicious Antibody-Mediated Acute Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients
Author/Authors :
Ahmadi, F Department of Pharmacotherapy - School of Pharmacy - Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan , Dashti-Khavidaki, S Department of Clinical Pharmacy - Faculty of Pharmacy - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Khatami, M. R Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Gatmiri, M Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Ahmadi, F Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Najafi, M. T. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Foroozanfar, Z Department of Epidemiology - Faculty of Public Health - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Mahdizadeh, A Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran , Derafshi, S Imam-Khomeini Hospital Complex - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
Abstract :
Background: There is no treatment of choice for the management of acute antibody-mediated rejection
(ABMR) in kidney transplant recipients. Plasmapheresis ± intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) ± rituximab
has been used in different regimens with contradictory results.
Objective: To compare three regimens of acute ABMR management including plasmapheresis + IVIg ±
rituximab in two different rituximab regimens.
Methods: In this prospective, observational study kidney transplant recipients with suspicious ABMR
were categorized into three groups. Group 1 patients were treated with plasmapheresis + IVIg. Groups 2
and 3 received weekly rituximab at a dosage of 375 mg/m2 for either 4 doses (group 2 or high dose) or 2
doses (group 3 or low dose) in addition to plasmapheresis + IVIg.
Results: 8, 15, and 9 patients were categorized in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was no difference
among the groups in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics of recipients and donors.
Although, 1-year graft (37.5%, 60.0%, and 66.7% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p=0.308) and patients
survival (75.0%, 86.7%, and 77.8% for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p=0.730) were not significantly
different among studied groups, graft survival was 22%–30% higher in rituximab-treated groups.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate at 12th month of follow-up did not differ among groups (56.3±19.6,
57.3±20.6, 48.7±16.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; p=0.683). However, kidney
function steadily improved over time in rituximab-treated patients.
Conclusion: Adding high or low doses of rituximab to plasmapheresis + IVIg comparably increased graft
survival in suspicious acute ABMR kidney recipients and steadily improved kidney function among survived
allografts over time.
Keywords :
Antibody-mediated acute rejection , Intravenous immunoglobulin , Kidney transplantation , Plasmapheresis , Rituximab
Journal title :
Astroparticle Physics