Title of article :
A 2D Image-Based Approach for CFD Validation of Liquid Mixing in a Free-Surface Condition
Author/Authors :
Rodríguez-Ocampo, P. E Institute of Engineering - National Autonomous University of Mexico - Mexico , Ring, M Institute of Engineering - National Autonomous University of Mexico - Mexico , Hernández-Fontes, J. V Institute of Engineering - National Autonomous University of Mexico - Mexico , Alcérreca-Huerta, J. C Department of Systematics and Aquatic Ecology - National Autonomous University of Mexico - Mexico , Mendoza, E Institute of Engineering - National Autonomous University of Mexico - Mexico , Gallegos-Diez-Barroso, G Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute (CINVESTAV) - Merida - Mexico , Silva, R Institute of Engineering - National Autonomous University of Mexico - Mexico
Abstract :
This study proposes an image-based approach to evaluate the validity of numerical results for cases where the
setup can be assumed to be two-dimensional (2D) and mixing between liquids of different densities occurs
under a free-surface condition. The proposed methodology is based on the estimation of the relative errors of
the model through density matrices generated from images of the experimental and numerical results (i.e., postprocessing snapshots of the density field). To demonstrate the use of the methodology, experimental tests and
numerical simulations were performed for a double-dam-break problem with two miscible liquids. For the
experiments, a high-speed camera was employed to capture details of the fluid interactions after the dam
breaking. For the numerical simulations, an OpenFOAM® multiphase solver was employed to reproduce the
benchmarking tests. Three turbulence approaches were tested: a zero-equation RANS model, a two-equation
(k-epsilon) RANS model, and a Large-Eddy Simulation (LES) model. The experimental results compared
favorably against the numerical results, with averaged relative errors of ~17 and ~19 % for the zero-equation
and the two-equation turbulence models, respectively, and ~14 % for the LES model. From the results obtained,
it can be inferred that the two-equation (k-epsilon) model had limitations in reproducing the mixing between
the liquid phases in terms of relative errors. The LES model reproduces the mixing between phases more
accurately than zero and two-equation RANS models, which were seen to be more suitable for capturing the
formation of large eddies in the initial phase of the experiment. The present methodology can be improved and
extended for different multiphase flow configurations
Keywords :
Numerical modelling , Multiphase flow , Liquid-liquid-gas interface flows , Turbulence models , Validation , Dam-break experiments