Author/Authors :
Taheri, Ahmad Reza Department of Plastic Surgery - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Farahvash, Mohamad Reza Department of Plastic Surgery - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Fathi, Hamid Reza Department of Plastic Surgery - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Ghanbarzadeh, Koorosh Department of Plastic Surgery - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Faridniya, Bijan Department of Plastic Surgery - Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
BACKGROUND Surgery, as the main approach in higher stages of gynecomastia, has different techniques regarding the staging of the disease. The more the grade of gynecomastia, the more complicated the used surgical techniques, conventionally. This study assessed the success rate of the simplest surgical technique in higher grades of gynecology as well as the satisfaction rate in patients and surgeon to offer using the technique for higher grades of the disease. METHODS To evaluate the success and the satisfaction rates of periareolar incision and liposuction among patients with grade II and III gynecomastia, this cross-sectional study was conducted. RESULTS The satisfaction rate was the main concern of the present study. The patients had a mean satisfaction score of 8.1±1.396 with the range of 5-10 from total 10 score. The majority of the patients expressed their satisfaction by 9 score. The total mean of physician satisfaction score was 8.36 at all levels. CONCLUSION Like aesthetic reasons which lead individuals to seek solutions for their annoying gynecomastia, aesthetic satisfaction is a prominent concern for people who undergo surgical approach. So, the least surgical scar and complications are absolutely the most area of focus in this regard.
Keywords :
Gynecomastia , Periareolar incision , Liposuction , Satisfaction rate