Author/Authors :
Karimi, Fatemeh Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz , Soltani, Majid Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz , Shaterzadeh Yazdi, Mohammad Jafar Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz , Moradi, Negin Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz , Shariari, Saman Department of Language and French Literature - Faculty of Letters and Humanities - Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz , Latifi, Mahmoud Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz
Abstract :
Objectives: The current study mainly aimed at studying the effect of Knowledge of Result
(KR) feedback timing and result-estimation opportunity before receiving delayed KR on
learning a new speech motor skill in monolingual healthy adults.
Methods: Thirty-nine Persian healthy adults were randomly divided into three groups. Each
group received immediate KR, delayed KR (after eight seconds), or delayed KR (after eight
seconds) with self-estimation of the result in the delay interval. All three groups received verbal
KR feedback. Participants were trained to produce a French phoneme (/ɪn/) in the context of
words in four training sessions. The correct production of the target phoneme was judged by a
bilingual Persian-French examiner holding an academic degree in French language teaching.
Later, a transfer test and two retention tests were administered. The two retention tests were
administered one day and two weeks after the last training session respectively.
Results: The effect of feedback timing on motor performance and motor learning was
examined by repeated-measures ANOVA. Performance in both acquisition and retention
phases was significantly different between groups (P=0.04 for both phases). One-way ANOVA
was used to investigate the transfer of learning (P=0.001). Tukey test results indicated that the
groups 1 and 2 were different in both acquisition and retention phases and all three groups were
different in transfer test.
Discussion: The results showed that the immediate KR is beneficial for the acquisition phase,
and delayed KR is more beneficial for the retention and transfer tests compared with immediate
KR.
Keywords :
Motor learning , Knowledge of results , Result estimation , Delayed feedback , Motor speech , Immediate feedback