Author/Authors :
Chaudhary, Preeti Department of Rehabilitation Sciences - School of Nursing Sciences and Allied Health - Jamia Hamdard University - New Delhi, India , Hamdani, Nusrat Department of Rehabilitation Sciences - School of Nursing Sciences and Allied Health - Jamia Hamdard University - New Delhi, India , Sharma, Prateek Indian Head Injury Foundation - Zamrudpur - New Delhi, India
Abstract :
Objectives: The primary study objective was to assess the effects of visuomotor training on grip
strength and wrist movements in adults and the elderly to be efficiently used in rehabilitation. The
secondary objective was to compare the post-training changes between the two groups.
Methods: This was a pre-test-post-test quasi-experimental study, including healthy individuals
aged 25-44 (adults) and 65-79 (elderly) years. Individuals suffering from neuromuscular or
musculoskeletal system disorders were excluded from the study. Grip strength (kg) and wrist
movements (˚) were recorded by the equipment (Pablo system). Moreover, the scores of the
Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHQ) were recorded after interviewing the individuals.
The study subjects were then provided with training (game-based) by Pablo system for 24 min/ d,
thrice a week. Finally, post-test scores were recorded after 4 weeks of training.
Results: Groups 1 and 2 had the Mean±SD age of 35.8±9 and 68.5±7.2 years, respectively.
The obtained data were analyzed using the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey-Kramer
multiple comparison test. The within-group analysis of group 1 demonstrated differences (pre-post)
of 1.09 kg, 4.39°, and 3.7° in grip strength, wrist extension, and flexion, respectively, after the
training. The differences between the different parameters of MHQ viz. function, work, pain, and
satisfaction were 2.7, 1, 1.1, and 0.3, respectively. No change was observed in the Activities of
Daily Living (ADLs) and satisfaction. The within-group analysis of group 2 indicated the mean
score differences of 0.3 kg and 6.53° in grip strength and wrist extension, respectively. Wrist flexion
revealed a decrease from pre-test to post-test phases. The difference in MHQ parameters; function,
ADLs, work, pain, aesthetics, and satisfaction were 2.4, 1.2, 2.4, 4, 0.5, and 1.59, respectively. The
between-group analysis suggested better improvement of grip strength, wrist flexion, and function
in adults; while wrist extension, ADL, and work were better in the elderly. There was no significant
difference in this area.
Discussion: Previous studies have explored the visuomotor training, using game-based
rehabilitation, non-immersive virtual reality, or robotic therapy. They have suggested that it would
provide neuroplasticity and cortical reorganization, and enhance brain reward system. The low
scores obtained in some subjective parameters like satisfaction could be due to different perceptions
in individuals. Degenerative changes like osteoarthritis could be a possible reason for the high
score of pain in the elderly. Future studies are required with larger sample sizes, control groups,
incorporating other factors, and so on. This study may be beneficial in overcoming the limitations
of conventional protocols such as labor, compliance, and adherence. It could also play an important
role in rehabilitation, especially neurorehabilitation, by providing a new perspective.
Keywords :
Visuomotor training , Grip strength , Pablo system , Michigan hand outcome questionnaire , Computer-based rehabilitation , Elderly