Title of article :
Preoperative Clinical Correctability and Prediction of the Prosthesis Type in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Severe Osteoarthritic Varus Deformity
Author/Authors :
Shahpari Omid Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center - Shafa Orthopedic Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Bagherifard Abolfazl Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center - Shafa Orthopedic Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Jabalameli Mahmoud Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center - Shafa Orthopedic Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Rahbar Mohammad Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center - Shafa Orthopedic Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran , Hajitaghi Hossein Bone and Joint Reconstruction Research Center - Shafa Orthopedic Hospital - Iran University of Medical Sciences - Tehran, Iran
Abstract :
The preoperative identification of patients who might need Constrained Condylar
Knee (CCK) prosthesis in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), is essential to ensure the availability
of equipment and to address the patients’ expectations accurately.
Objectives: In this study, we aimed at investigating if the preoperative features of the patients
can provide this data.
Methods: A total of 30 patients who underwent primary TKA for severe osteoarthritic genu
varum deformity (varus angle ≥20º) were evaluated in this retrospective study. Prosthesis
selection was based on preoperative and intraoperative information. Demographic data,
preoperative correctability of the deformity, and intraoperative information, including the
reduction osteotomy, soft-tissue release, and pie-crust technique, were retrospectively collected.
Soft-tissue release was performed in a sequential manner in 3 steps.
Results: The study population included 4 males and 26 females with a Mean±SD age of
64.6±8.7 years. A CCK prosthesis was used in 11 (36.7%) cases. A significant association was
found between the preoperative correctability and the type of prosthesis. In other words, all CCK
prostheses were used in patients who were preoperatively non-correctable (P<0.001). Also, the
step of release was significantly associated with the type of prosthesis, and CCK prosthesis was
used in all patients with step 3 release (P<0.001). Preoperative correctability was significantly
related to the step of release, as well. It means that all deformities with step 3 release were
preoperatively non-correctable (P=0.008).
Conclusion: The preoperative clinical evaluation of correctability could be used in the
identification of patients who might need a CCK prosthesis.
Keywords :
Constrained condylar knee prosthesis , Total knee arthroplasty , Severe genu varum deformity
Journal title :
Shafa Orthopedic Journal