Author/Authors :
Brillantino, Antonio Department of Surgery - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Iacobellis, Francesca Department of Radiology - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Festa, Patrizio Department of Surgery - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Mottola, Arianna Department of Surgery - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Acampora, Ciro Department of Radiology - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Corvino, Fabio Interventional Radiology Department - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Del Giudice, Santolo Department of Surgery - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Lanza, Michele Department of Surgery - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Armellino, Mariano Department of Surgery - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Niola, Raffaella Interventional Radiology Department - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Romano, Luigia Department of Radiology - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Castriconi, Maurizio Department of Surgery - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Palma, Maurizio De Department of Surgery - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy , Noschese, Giuseppe Department of Surgery - Cardarelli” Hospital - Italy
Abstract :
Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of NOM (nonoperative management) in the treatment of blunt liver trauma, following a standardized treatment protocol.Methods: All the hemodynamically stable patients with computed tomography (CT) diagnosis of blunt liver trauma underwent NOM. It included strict clinical and laboratory observation, 48-72h contrast enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) or CT follow-up, a primary angioembolization in case of admission CT evidence of vascular injuries and a secondary angioembolization in presence of vascular injuries signs at follow-up CEUS.Results: 181 patients (85.4%) [55 (30.4%) women and 126 (69.6%) men, median age 39 (range 14–71)] were included. Of these, 63 patients (34.8%) had grade I, 48 patients (26.5%) grade II, 39 patients (21.5%) grade III, 21 patients (11.6%) grade IV and 10 patients (5.5%) grade V liver injuries. The overall success rate of NOM was 96.7% (175/181). There was not significant difference in the success rate between the patients with different liver injuries grade. Morbidity rate was 7.4% (13/175). Major complications (2 bilomas, 1 liver hematoma and 2 liver abscesses) were successfully treated by CEUS or CT guided drainage. Eighteen (18/181) patients (9.9%) underwent angioembolization with successful results.Conclusion: Nonoperative management of blunt liver trauma represents a safe and effective treatment for both minor and severe injuries, achieving an high success rate and an acceptable morbidity rate. The angiographic study with embolization, although required only in selected cases of vascular injuries, represents a fundamental therapeutic option in a significant percentage of patients.
Keywords :
Hepatic trauma , Liver injury , Blunt trauma , Nonoperative management , Angioembolization
