Author/Authors :
Gurjar, O. P Department of Radiotherapy - All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal , Arya, R Department of Radiation Oncology - Mahatma Gandhi Memorial Medical College, Indore , Goyal, H Roentgen-SAIMS Radiation Oncology Centre - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore , Handa, P Roentgen-SAIMS Radiation Oncology Centre - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore , Bagdare, P Roentgen-SAIMS Radiation Oncology Centre - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore , Khan, A Roentgen-SAIMS Radiation Oncology Centre - Sri Aurobindo Institute of Medical Sciences, Indore , Paliwal, R. K Department of Physics - Mewar University, Chittorgarh , Mishra, S. P Department of Physics - Mewar University, Chittorgarh
Abstract :
Background: Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) of medulloblastoma poses technological
challenges due to the involvement of large treatment volume. Commonly, the
whole treatment length is covered with two different isocentric plans in which the
junction is shifted after every five fractions to overcome the possibility of hot and
cold spot.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate dosimetrically and clinically the innovative
planning technique for the CSI which doesn’t need re-planning and re-setup of
patients after every five fractions.
Material and Methods: Computed tomography was done for fifteen (ten
children and five adults) patients diagnosed with medulloblastoma. Treatment planning
for 36 Gray (Gy) in 20 fractions (#) at the rate of 1.8Gy/# was done on the
treatment planning system. A single plan for children was created with two bilateral
fields of 6 Mega Voltage (MV) energy for cranium and one posterior field of 6 MV
for spinal cord (C1-S2). Two plans for adult patients were created, first plan was with
two bilateral fields of 6 MV for cranium and two posterior oblique fields of 6 MV for
cervical and the part of thoracic spinal cord (up to T8-T9). The second plan was with
a single posterior field of 15 MV covering remaining thoracic (T8-T9 to T12), lumbar
and sacrum (up to lower border of S2) spine. After careful evaluation of all the plans,
treatment was delivered; acute toxicities were recorded.
Results: 95% of prescribed dose was received by more than 95% of planning
target volume in all the plans with the acceptable hot spot and good homogeneity
index. All the patients reported common radiation induced acute toxicities (headache,
vomiting, weakness) during radiotherapy.
Conclusion: The new planning technique for CSI has acceptable dosimetric and
acute clinical possibilities; therefore it can be used for CSI for improved homogeneous
dose delivery.
Keywords :
Medulloblastoma , Field Edge Matching , Feathering Technique , Craniospinal Irradiation