Author/Authors :
Soleymanzadeh Moghadam, Somayeh Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center - Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Fagheei Aghmiyuni, zeinab Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center - Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , mohammad, nazanin Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center - Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , majidpour, ali Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center - Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , roham, maryam Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center - Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , annisian, ali Antimicrobial Resistance Research Center - Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , azimi, maryam Immunology Research Center - Institute of Immunology and Infectious Diseases - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , nasirinezhad, farinaz Physiology Research Center - Iran University of Medical Sciences
Abstract :
Background: Burn wound is an important cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Improving the host’s immune system and removing the
infection can be effective in healing wounds caused by burns. Granulocyte‑colony‑stimulating factor (G‑CSF) stimulates both the bone marrow to
produce granulocytes and the function of neutrophil precursors. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of G‑CSF on removing infection
and healing wound. Materials and Methods: A burn model was used to induce burns in 18 adult Balb/c mice, and their wounds were infected
by Acinetobacter baumannii strains. Burned mice were divided into two groups (control and G‑CSF) and treated daily by subcutaneous injections
of normal saline (0.1 mL) and G‑CSF (10 μg/kg). The wound healing process was evaluated by the morphological and histological assessments.
Results: In morphological assay, the mean size of the wounds in the 3rd and 7th days of the treatment was significantly lower in the G‑CSF treated
group compared to the control group. Some of the histological parameters were evaluated, including the level of inflammation, re‑epithelialization,
angiogenesis, collagen deposition, the amount of granulation tissue, and fibroblast maturation. The results showed that inflammation was reduced
in the G‑CSF‑treated group, and re‑epithelialization and collagen deposition were increased insignificantly compared to the normal saline‑treated
group. Furthermore, bacterial translocation was reduced significantly in the G‑CSF‑treated group. Conclusion: G‑CSF enhances wound closure
and helps in wound healing by improving the immune system. It has also an anti‑inflammatory role and reduces bacterial translocation.
Keywords :
Acinetobacter baumannii , burn , granulocyte‑colony‑stimulating factor , wound healing