Author/Authors :
Zamanlou, M School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Department of Physical Therapy - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Akbari, M School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Department of Physical Therapy - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Jamshidi, A. A School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Department of Physical Therapy - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Amiri, A School of Rehabilitation Sciences - Department of Physical Therapy - Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Nabiyouni, i School of Public Health - Department of Kinesiology - Indiana University, Bloomington, United State of America
Abstract :
Background: Lumbar motion analysis is used as a clinical method in the diagnosis
and treatment of low back pain (LBP). So far, no studies have shown if manipulating
the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) will change spinal kinematics.
Objective: The main objectives of this study were to investigate the effects of
SIJ manipulation on the lumbar kinematics in subjects with innominate rotation and
to compare lumbar kinematics among experiment and control groups.
Material and Methods: This study was a quasi-experiment-control trial
study. 21 LBP patients with anterior or posterior innominate rotations in experiment
group and 22 asymptomatic subjects in control group were evaluated. Lumbar kinematic
variables (LKV) include lumbar range of motion (ROM) and speed, lumbar
lateral flexion and rotation asymmetry were evaluated using Qualysis Track Manager
(QTM) twice within two days in control group, and these parameters with pelvic
asymmetry and disability were tested before and after intervention in the experiment
group.
Results: While pre-intervention experiment group exhibited significantly lower
lumbar lateral flexion (p=0.0001), rotation (p=0.008) ROM and lower lateral flexion
speed (p=0.014), post-intervention experiment group exhibited significantly lower
lumbar lateral flexion (p=0.01) ROM in comparison with control group. Pelvic asymmetry
(p=0.049) and disability (p=0.01) significantly decreased in the experiment
group after manipulation, but LKV did not change significantly after the intervention
(p˃0.05).
Conclusion: Experiment groups had different lumbar kinematics in comparison
with control group before and after SIJ manipulation. Despite the changes in pelvic
asymmetry and disability, intervention had no effect on lumbar kinematics.
Keywords :
Disability , Asymmetry , Innominate , Kinematics , SIJ Manipulation