Author/Authors :
Guamán-Lozada, D. F Escuela Superior Politécnica del Chimborazo, Riobamba, Chimborazo, Ecuador , Cabrera-Escobar, J Escuela Superior Politécnica del Chimborazo, Riobamba, Chimborazo, Ecuador , Guamán- Lozada, M. D Hospital del IESS “Guasmo Sur”, Guayaquil, Guayas, Ecuador , Romero-Rodríguez, V Universidad Técnica de Ambato, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador , Castro-Martin, A. P Independent Researcher, Ambato, Tungurahua, Ecuador , Romero-Rodríguez, M. G Universidad Nacional del Chimborazo, Riobamba, Chimborazo, Ecuador , Ying-Ying, H The 2nd Affiliated Hospital &Yuying Children’s Hospital - Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China , Zhi-Han, Y The 2nd Affiliated Hospital &Yuying Children’s Hospital - Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China , Jia- Wei, H The 2nd Affiliated Hospital &Yuying Children’s Hospital - Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
Abstract :
Background: Scoliosis is a health problem that causes a side-to-side curvature
in the spine. The curvature may have an “S” or “C” shape. To evaluate scoliosis, the
Cobb angle has been commonly used. However, digital image processing allows the
Cobb angle to be obtained easily and quickly, several researchers have determined
that Cobb angle contains high variations (errors) in the measurements. Therefore, a
more reproducible computer aided-method to evaluate scoliosis is presented.
Material and Methods: In this analytical study, several polynomial curves
were fitted to the spine curvature (4th to 8th order) of thirty plain films of scoliosis
patients to obtain the Curvature-Length of the spine. Each plain film was evaluated
by 3 physician observers. Curvature was measured twice using the Cobb method and
the proposed Curvature-Length Technique (CLT). Data were analyzed by a pairedsample
Student t-test and Pearson correlation method using SPSS Statistics 25.
Results: The curve of 7th order polynomial had the best fit on the spine curvature
and was also used for our proposed method (CLT) obtaining a significant positive
correlation when compared to Cobb measurements (r=0.863, P<0.001). The Intraclass
Correlation (ICC) was between 0.863 and 0.948 for Cobb method and0.974 to
0.984 for CLT method. In addition, mean measurement of the inter-observer COV
(Coefficient of Variation) for Cobb method was of 0.185, that was significantly
greater than the obtained with CLT method of 0.155, this means that CLT method is
16.2% more repeatable than Cobb Method.
Conclusion: Based on results, it was concluded that CLT method is more reproducible
than the Cobb method for measuring spinal curvature.
Keywords :
Cobb-Angle , Methods , Polynomial , Spinal Curvatures , Scoliosis