Title of article :
Tensile Bond Strength of Three Custom-made Tooth-Colored Implant Superstructures to Titanium Inserts
Author/Authors :
Zirak, Mitra Dept. of Prosthodontics - School of Dentistry - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , Reza Khaledi, Amir Ali Dept. of Prosthodontics - School of Dentistry - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran , Farzin, Mitra Dept. of Prosthodontics - School of Dentistry - Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
Abstract :
Statement of the Problem: Hybrid abutments are made of a titanium implant insert
and a ceramic component. The tensile bond strength between the titanium implant
insert and the ceramic component is not still clearly known.
Purpose: This in vitro study aimed to compare the tensile bond strength of the titanium
insert to ceramic components made of milled lithium disilicate, milled zirconia,
and pressable lithium disilicate.
Materials and Method: To standardize the shape and dimension of the ceramic
components, a single computer-aided design/computer assisted manufacturing
(CAD/CAM) superstructure was designed with Dental Designer software. Based on
this model, CAD milled zirconia (Zr), CAD milled Lithium disilicate (CAD-LD)
and heat-pressed lithium-disilicate (H-LD) superstructures were fabricated (n=10 per
group). They were bonded to the titanium inserts by using self-adhesive resin cement.
The prepared superstructure-titanium insert complexes (hybrid abutments)
were screwed into the implants with 35 Ncm torque. The tensile bond strength of the
ceramic superstructures to the titanium inserts were recorded by the universal testing
machine with a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min. The data were analyzed by using oneway
ANOVA and Tamhane post-hoc test (p< 0.05).
Results: The mean±SD of tensile bond strength was 328.50±30.4 N in CAD-LD,
257.30±23.8 N in H-LD, and 242.20±21.2 N in Zr groups. One-way ANOVA revealed
the groups significantly different in terms of the tensile bond strength (p<
0.001). Tamhane post-hoc test showed a significant difference between the CAD-LD
and the two other groups (p<0.001); however, no statistically significant difference
was detected between the H-LD and Zr groups (p= 0.39).
Conclusion: It can be concluded that the CAD-LD has higher bond strength to titanium
insert compared with the H-LD and Zr groups. Therefore, they might be clinically
more beneficial in high-esthetic areas.
Keywords :
Zirconia , Lithium disilicate , Implant , Bond strength
Journal title :
Journal of Dentistry :Shiraz University of Medical Sciences