Title of article
A Review of Microsurgery Versus Endoscopy: Controversies for Treatment of Colloid Cysts
Author/Authors
Razzaghi, Alireza Safety Promotion and Injury Prevention Research Center - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Yousefi, Atefeh Functional Neurosurgery Research Center - Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , Alizadeh, Sajjad Functional Neurosurgery Research Center - Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence - Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Pages
6
From page
123
To page
128
Abstract
Background:There is controversy about the value of endoscopic methods compared to microsurgical
methods in the treatment of challenging colloidal cysts. This study aimed to review the findings of
literature which studied microsurgery or neuroendoscopy in the colloid cyst.
Methods: An advanced search in PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases performed
using keywords such as: “microsurgery,” “endoscopy,” “microsurgery versus endoscopy,” and
“colloid cysts.”
Results: Reviewing the findings of related studies showed some differences in sections of surgical
management, microsurgery, endoscopy, complete cyst resection, recurrence rate, length of stay, and
complications between the two surgical methods in the treatment of colloid cyst.
Conclusion: Despite some disadvantages of endoscopy, it seems this method has more privileges
than the other methods.
Keywords
Microsurgery , Endoscopy , Surgery , Colloid cysts
Journal title
International Clinical Neuroscience Journal
Serial Year
2019
Record number
2503000
Link To Document